Brahma Vidyā or Ātma Vidyā: The science that is elaborated in Upanishads deals with God, world and man, the eternal curiosities of human mind. Upanishads (Vedānta) presented God as Sat-chit-Ānanda, pure existence or Truth, pure Consciousness and pure Bliss. That is, in other words, the infinite Brahman. All Upanishads emphasize only one aspect and they are all engaged in only one task: to prove that “Just as by the knowledge of one lump of clay we have the knowledge of all the clay (and its modifications) in the universe, so what is that knowledge knowing which we know everything in the universe?” The central theme of all Upanishads is the ‘spiritual unity and solidarity’ of all existence.Although the fundamental theme of Upanishad doctrine is god-realization and thereby attaining the ultimate, everlasting liberation from all human miseries, certain ideas emerge as central to the teaching of almost all Upanishads. The most important of them are the value of knowledge (jñāna) and the need for complete detachment (vairāgya). To the great Ṡankara Bhagavatpada these two aspects represent ‘the two wings that are indispensable for the soul, if it should soar unrestricted to its eternal home of freedom and peace’ (Viveka chudāmani). Only when the significance and relevance of these two conceptions is explained in terms of spiritual aspirations of the seeker, one can really get to know the central teaching of the Upanishads.
Thursday, 4 June 2020
Friday, 2 August 2019
JNANA MUDRA
Although the
adaptation of grasping hand is a common primate feature as both monkeys and
apes possess this quality, man is unique in the possession of the ability to
oppose the thumb to his forefinger with all the other three fingers stretched
out. In Indian Vedāntic and spiritual circles this gesture is
of deep significance. The thumb when opposed to the index finger with other
fingers outstretched is a representation of yogic ‘knowledge pose’ (jñāna mudra) which is a remarkable sign
of some profound psychic expression. As the mind is so is the body, hence our
body postures have psychological counter parts. This one ability of human being
is indicative of the uniqueness of human species as it expresses the level of
development of the human brain as a rational thinking instrument, capable of
acquiring a plethora of knowledge and skills. This human ‘knowledge pose’
represents the ability to search for immense, insatiable, knowledge. Scientifically,
it has been discovered that the number of brain cells needed to manipulate
these two fingers involved in ‘knowledge pose’ is the largest compared to those
involved in manipulating all other fingers. “This ability to oppose the thumb
to the forefinger is highly symbolic of human search for knowledge from the
most ordinary to the most extraordinary levels.” (Swami Ranganāthānanda, The Charm and Power of the Gita, page 52). At the
level of human evolution this adaptation was the beginning of humanity’s
technological progress, cultural evolution and spiritual emancipation. It is
interesting to note that in all the iconography of India, of great saints,
sages and incarnations and of the divine mother the particular pose of jnana mudra is depicted.
Wednesday, 20 February 2019
Glimpses of Indian Scientific Heritage
Puranas: An amalgam of science , spirituality and philosophy
The Puranas are
the magnifying glasses of the Vedas as they enlarge small images of Vedic
principles into big images. Vedic injunctions are often in the form of pithy
statements. They are magnified or elaborated in the form of stories or
anecdotes in the Puranas. When a brief exposition of an idea is presented as an
interesting story or anecdote, it will make a lasting impact and stay in the
mind. The Vedas merely say ‘ satyam vada’ that is speak the truth. When it is
presented as a narration of the story of king Harischandra, the underlying
glory of the Vedic injunction becomes clear and lasting. Thus the Vedic
injunctions such as restraint, patience, compassion, charity etc. are
illustrated through the life of men and women in Puranas.
Puranas are
indeed history of ancient India. However, modern scholars do not accept
anything as historical unless it happened after the advent of Christian era.
Everything before that is mythology for them. Anything beyond the normal
experience of the ordinary senses of the ordinary men is rejected as something
outside the realm of truth.
Unlike modern
history Puranas present only selected events in such a way to educate the
people in right and wrong and make them follow the path of righteousness.
Puranas also depict the theistic philosophy of ancient India and lead people to
a religious life with devotion to the Almighty ( bhakti). They are also
accounts of scientific and technological achievements of people of that time.
Of course Puranas have resorted to fictional stories here and there. But they
are not totally fictitious. They definitely take us nearer to god and bring peace
of mind.
There are 18
Puranas and 18 sub-puranas. Each Purana keeps on a single deity as its main
theme. Of these 18 mahapuranas 10 are said
to be Saivite; rest of them extol Vishnu or Shakti.
By definition
a Purana has to fulfil five requirements in the matter of what it should
contain. They are: 1) Sarga, (original creation of the world); 2) Pratisarga (
the world after creation ): 3) Vamsa ( Genealogy, how the descendant came from
one generation to the next); 4) Manvantara ( the history of 14 Manus from whom
the mankind descended); 5) Vamsaanucharita ( the history of rulers of the country
and dynastic details).
Thus it can be
seen that Puranas are historical accounts of early human civilizations in ancient
India. They abound with accounts of cosmology, evolution, human history,
culture, religion, social sciences, secular sciences and theistic philosophy of
Sanatana Dharma, the Vedic eternal religion.
Science and Technology
Puranas as
indicated earlier are compilations of ancient Indian history, social and political
systems, philosophy of life and a host of other features of ancient Indian
civilization. The entire Indian civilization is an edifice built on solid
scientific foundations with bricks of ethical, moral and political norms,
cemented by lofty spiritual ideals. Ancient Indian sages, unlike modern
scientists, never differentiated or separated science from spirituality,
philosophy and religion. Such compartmentalisation is a modern phenomenon
started from the 16th century C.E. All these disciplines were interwoven
into a matrix of a way of life called Sanatana Dharma or eternal religion. Hence
the modern investigator has to struggle hard to separate science and technology
from highly symbolic mythology in the Puranas. Often one has to read in between
the lines, go beyond imaginative discourses to understand the truth behind the symbolism
as practised in the Puranas. One should have an unbiased and honest approach to
unearth the truth.
The science
and technology of the Puranas is an extension and elaboration of Vedic science,
highly camouflaged in deep mythological and religious sentiments. Often one has
to deduce meanings and motives from what is expressed in the stories of Puranas
to understand the scientific principles which lie behind the mythology of the
Puranas.
The Bhagavata
Purana which is the most popular of all the Puranas is not only a Vaishnavite
religious treatise but also a fundamental text of Vedantic philosophy,
especially of the theistic Vedanta. It is also a goldmine for those who are searching
for accounts of ancient Indian theories of cosmology and evolution. It also
provides an insight into the Vedantic theories of the nature, origin, evolution
and final destination of human life. This Purana contains valuable information
that sheds light on the scientific bent of ancient Indian sages. This is true
regarding most of other Puranas as well.
Tuesday, 5 February 2019
MIND--BRAIN ENIGMA
Modern science of
neurophysiology attempts to explore the relationship between human mind and
brain. The questions being often asked are “what exactly is the physical and
functional relationship between the mind and brain? Are they the same or
different?” These queries arose not only in the minds of modern psychologists
and neurologists but in the minds of ancient Indian and western philosophers,
theologians and other intellectuals as well. Ancient concepts regarding mind
and body originating from India thousands of years ago emphasized a holistic
view of mind and body or mind and matter.The Upanishads
and the Sānkhya philosophy of sage Kapila
emphasized that the individual consciousness or Ātman is one and the same with the consciousness of
the universe or Brahman, thus declaring that ‘everything in the universe is the
integral part of Brahman’. (Sarvam
khalvidam Brahma). The Upanishads gave a new insight into the conscious state
of mind by emphasizing that mind and matter are two aspects of the same
reality. Western thoughts about the mind and consciousness stemmed from the
views of Greek philosophers Plato 427-347 BCE) and Aristotle (384-322 BCE)
followed by Rene Descartes (1596 -1650 CE), John Locke (1632-1704 CE), Immanuel
Kant (1724-1804 CE) and many other brilliant intellectuals. They projected a
dualistic view of the mind and brain emphasizing that the substance of the mind
is different from the substance of brain or any other physical organs or
matter. However, most of the modern scientists believe that the mind is a
product of the brain, in effect emphasizing that consciousness is the product
of matter.
Thousands of years
ago Indian sages conducted elaborate in-depth explorations of the human mind,
its function and relation to the gross body. The oldest accounts of these
psychological studies have been detailed in the
Sānkhya System of philosophy of
Sage Kapila and the Upanishads which are
the essence of Vedic wisdom. As per ancient Indian wisdom mind belongs to the
subtle body which is formed out of the fundamental particles (tanmātras) of the
five essential elements called panchabhūtas. The grossification (panchikaranam)
of the tanmātras gives rise to the panchabhūtas or five elements namely space
(ākāṡa), air (vāyu), fire or energy (Tejas or Agni), water (apas) and earth (pṛthvi).
Materials of all living and nonliving entities in the universe are made of these
five elements. Thus the physical basis
of the mind is the subtle aspect of the body and the difference between brain
and mind is only in terms of a measure of subtlety. Subtle matter is more
pervasive and that explains the presence of a conscious mind in each and every
cell of the body complex in a multi-cellular body and in the subtle realms of
the body of a unicellular organism. According
to Vedānta thoughts are vibrations (energy?) as a
reaction to the impact of sensory stimuli brought to the mind by the sensory
system more or less like the impact of stone creating waves of water in a lake.
These thoughts are analyzed in deeper realms of the mind called intellect
(buddhi) and the discriminated thoughts are recognized by the soul which is but
the reaction of the light of the Spirit or Ātman, the Supreme Consciousness. This concept of awareness of the conscious mind is first enunciated by the
Sānkhya system and adopted by the Vedāntic
system later. Swami Vivekānanda has aptly described the genesis of perception according to Sānkhya philosophy, “The affections of external objects are carried by
the sense organs to their respective brain centres from where they are carried
to the mind (manas). The manas conveys these messages to the determinative
faculty, the intelligence (buddhi). From the discriminative faculty the
messages of perception are passed on to the Purusha (the soul) who receives
them and the perception results. The Purusha or the soul gives orders to the motor centres to do the
needful. According to Sānkhya philosophy / Psychology everything else except
the Purusha is material instrument. The material that forms the mind is
composed of subtle matter called tanmātras. These become gross and form the
external matter” (Complete Works, Vol 1. pp.134-135).. “According to Sānkhya philosophy
the‘mind’ is an instrument instrument, as it
were, in the hands of the soul, through which the soul catches external
objects.” Vedānta subscribes to the same
philosophy and psychology when it says, “It (the Ātman) is
the ear of the ear, the mind of the mind, the speech of the speech, the prāṇa of
the prāṇa, and the eye of the
eye. Wise men separating
the Ātman from these (sensory system) rise out of sense-life and
attain immortality” (Kenopanishad, 1.2).
Modern physiology also would vouch for the fact that
external sense organs are not the real organs of sense, but that they are in
the various nerve centres of the brain. Modern science also agrees on the fact
that subtle centres which constitute the mental apparatus are also formed of
the same material (the embryonic ectoderm) as the brain itself. The Sānkhyas arrived
at this truth centuries before modern science had any inclination
of it.
Monday, 28 January 2019
THE HUMN MIND
Psychology in simple terms can be defined as the study of the mind and its operation. According to Vedanta ( Upanishads) the mind, sensory system and the vital force ( Manas, indriyas, and prana ) constitute what is called the subtle body of man ( sukshma sariram ). This comprises our psycho-physical system which is the source of all our experiences, emotions and awareness of the phenomenal world. Of these mind is the principal organ responsible for our existence., awareness and the total experience that constitutes life itself. Acharya Sankara makes this amply clear when he says,” when it (mind) is destroyed, everything else is destroyed, and when it is manifested, everything else is manifested “ ( Vivekachudamani.169 ). All human experiences are rooted in the mind and our world of experiences is woven out of the mental sheath. Once this source is destroyed, the universe ceases to exist for man. However, yogis through rigorous practices arrive at this no-mind state and at this state they transcend the phenomenal world to reach samadhi, the spiritual unity with the absolute. The Zen philosophy also speaks of such transcendental state.
Friday, 11 January 2019
MIND IN DEATH, REBIRTH AND LIBERATION
What happens to the mind at the time of the
death of the individual? Does it survive or perish along with the body as such?
Indian sages have discovered that it is only the gross body composed of the
seven ingredients namely marrow, bones, fat, nerves, flesh, blood, skin and
consisting of parts such as legs, arms, head, chest and back which are the
products of the five fundamental elements namely space (ākāṡa), air (vāyu),
energy (Tejas), water (Apah) and earth (pṛthvi) that perishes at the time of
death. The subtle body composed of the five great elements which have not
undergone grossification, and consisting of the five sense organs, the five
organs of action, the five prāṇas, the mind and the intellect, survives death
and destruction to be carried to the next life. Incessant cogitation of the
mind regarding the objects of desire prompts generation of intense desire for
them and results in the execution of various activities to fulfil such desires.
These actions, reactions and impressions of the unfulfilled desires create
impressions (vāsanas) in the subtlest recesses of the body called causal body
and this is the cause of transmigration of the soul to other bodies, in other
words the cause of rebirth. The Bṛhadāranyaka Upanishad vividly describes the process of detachment of the
subtle body from the gross body at the time of death (4..5-6). The Upanishad
brings out the essential difference between death and deep sleep very clearly.
In deep sleep although the mind and senses are withdrawn from the gross body to
the subtler realms, the prāṇas remain in
the gross body so that it is kept alive whereas in death, along with the mind and senses, the prāṇas are also withdrawn from the gross body. The gross body is
completely separated from the subtler body and there is no connection
whatsoever between the subtle and the physical bodies at the time of death. In
sleep this connection is maintained and the individual returns to the waking
life once again through this body. The sensation one feels in the body is the
sensation conveyed through the agency of the physical body to the subtle body
whose ‘presiding deity’ is the mind. In death the mind is withdrawn along with the prāṇa from the gross body.
The subtlest realms of the body which
constitute the impressions of the unfulfilled desires (vāsanas) and impressions
of the reactions of the activities of the waking world (samskāras) depart from
the gross body along with the soul or individual spirit to manufacture an abode
or a physical body commensurate with the requirement of fulfilment of the
unfulfilled desires of one’s life. According to Vedānta there is a
continuity of activity of the mind during the transmigration from one body to
another. Thus the entire cycle of birth and rebirth is a consequence of
desires, fulfilled or unfulfilled. Vedānta
emphasizes that the desires get enhanced in their
intensity the more they are fulfilled and the fulfilment of desires is not the
way to freedom from desires, the liberation or moksha. Desires can be overcome
by proper mind control through incessant
yogic practices as described in the Yogasūtras of Patanjali. Swami Vivekānanda says, “Yoga is
to help us put off our
body when we please and see it as our servant, our instrument, not our ruler.
Controlling the mental powers is the first great aim in Yoga practices. The
second is concentrating them in full force upon any subject” (Complete Works,
vol. 8. p.41.). The Upanishads say, “It is indeed the mind that is the cause of
men’s bondage and liberation. The mind that is attached to sense objects leads
to bondage, while dissociated from sense
objects it tends to liberation, so they think” ( Amritabindu Upanishad ).
Bhagavad gita
defines yoga as equanimity or mind in perfect balance (samatvam yoga uchyate;
2.48). When mind is detached from sense objects and when one is unconcerned as
regards success or failure in life, his mind is said to be in perfect balance.
When individuals with this mental attitude perform their duties they do not
accumulate karma phala and can achieve liberation or can be free from the
transmigratory life of birth and death.
Saturday, 29 December 2018
LIFE DEFINED
The most curious aspect of life, probably,
is that it can be lived and experienced but difficult, almost impossible, to
define. The early human beings realized that the world could be divided into
two categories of entities namely animate or living and inanimate or nonliving.
Intense observations on these two categories led them to draw certain essential
differences between the two. However,
Aristotle (384-322 B.C.E.) the legendary Greek philosopher believed that such
clear cut distinctions were not possible in nature. Despite intense scientific
investigations and observations even modern scientists agree with Aristotle in
that it is indeed difficult to arrive at a close distinction between living and
nonliving, although it is easy to distinguish an animal as living and a stone
as nonliving on a cursory observation.
All definitions of life in modern
science are concerned with the properties of life rather than the principle
called life. Accordingly physiologists define life as any system capable of
eating, metabolising, excreting, breathing, moving, growing, and reproducing
and constantly responding to external stimuli.
Metabolically life is the property of any object surrounded by a
definite boundary and capable of exchanging materials with its surroundings. A
single celled amoeba and a bacterium are examples of such systems.
Biochemically life subsists in cellular systems containing both nucleic acids (DNA
and RNA) and proteins (enzymes). A geneticist may define life as something that
belongs to systems which are able to perform complex transformations of organic
molecules, construct copies of themselves from raw materials and are capable of
evolutionary changes through natural selection. However, all these descriptions
fall short of the actual definition of the principle that makes a system living
and performing.
Indian sages recognised this life
principle as Atman which is the “unborn, eternal, everlasting entity that never
perishes when the body ceases to exist” (Katha Upanishad, 2.18). The same is
expressed in the Bhagavad Gīta as well (2.20). It is that principle which
enlivens all organ systems of organisms: “It is the ear of the ear, the mind of
the mind, the speech indeed of the speech, the breath of the breath, and the
eye of the eye” (Kena Upanishad, 1.2). “It moves (when the organism moves); it
does not move (because it is everywhere); it is far away (as it is beyond the
comprehension of common intellect), yet it is so near (as it is within every
living thing); it is the eternal spirit of everything that we know” (Īṡāvāsya
Upanishad, 5). However, ‘life’ is such a phenomenon “which has no definite
shape, neither beginning nor end” (Bhagavad Gīta, 15.3). Although it is true that life has
no definite shape or structure, it assumes the structure of the body through
which it is expressed. It may appear as a minute bacterium or as a big blue
whale which can easily accommodate a full grown elephant in its belly. It may
manifest as small as an alga or as a giant peepal or redwood tree. In other
words life manifests itself in innumerable shapes and sizes and numbers as
animals, trees, shrubs, grasses and a host of other forms, both ‘animate’ and
‘inanimate;’ it may also express itself through emotions, thoughts and
feelings. However, “when it is existing in a living body or departing from it
(at the time of death) this principle cannot be comprehended through ordinary
means of perception, but only through the eye of wisdom” (Bhagavad Gīta, 15.10).
It is beyond the comprehension of the sensory system of human beings, but could
be experienced by super sensory perception through yogic practices. All ancient
Indian scriptures vouch for the fact that the principle of life is eternal
entity without a beginning or end and is not destroyed along with the
destruction of the body. One interesting aspect of life is that various words
in different ancient languages used to denote life has something related to
breathing. The etymological roots of ‘soul’ and ‘spirit’ mean ‘breath’ in many
antique languages. The words used for ‘soul’ in Sanskrit (atman), Greek
(psyche) and Latin (anima) all mean ‘breath.’ The same is true for the word for
‘spirit’; in Latin (spiritus), in Greek (pneuma) and in Hebrew (rwab) all
meaning ‘breath.’ Of course, breathing is the immediate visible expression of
life in a living organism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)